The present use of ruled gratings for the absolute measurement of x-ray wave-lengths makes it necessary to investigate the possibility of systematic deviations from the simple formula for the diffraction from a perfect grating. A perfect grating is understood to have the following properties: (1) It is ruled on a continuum—its material has no atomic properties. (2) The optical properties of its material are completely determined by a refractive index (which may be complex). (3) It is ruled on a perfectly plane surface. (4) Its lines are truly parallel, identical, and uniformly spaced. (5) It is infinite in extent. (6) It is so oriented that the plane of incidence and **diffraction** is perpendicular to the rulings (this makes the problem two-dimensional). Of these properties, only (6) is non-essential and could be eliminated at the expense of a slight complication. The property (5) results in an infinite resolving power: theoretically, the resolving power of a finite portion of a perfect grating may be calculated in a manner which is discussed. It might seem that any derivation based on the foregoing simplifications could be no more general than the usual elementary derivation. However, the latter neglects the following factors: (a) The influence of multiple scattering; (b) Refraction, if the material of the grating is transparent. (This is really a particular case of (a)); (c) Shadows cast by one ruling on its neighbors; (d) Surface waves, similar to those arising on total reflection at a plane surface. In this case, these are the high order spectra for which sinθn1. A. H. Compton1 has given an elementary derivation which takes account of the factors (a), (b) and (c). The present calculation confirms his result that these factors do not influence the calculation of the wave-length, and extends it to include the factor (d).

**See also:**

- Dr Jovanka Petrovic read the latest magazines about Jovanka.